Scots have studied trust consequences of artificial system designs since 1758 (Smith, Watt) we see 2025-35 as intelligences most exciting decade - .
we recommend high school students & teachers follow these high-school lebel intelligence questions on how Japan-Taiwan-Singapore-HK-Korea & agentic ai can see millennials generate 10 times more health*wealthin 1905 einstein published mathematical correction to man's science -- e=mcsquared ; because this valuation is non linear, can you discuss if this makes governance linear planning of climate, energy, finance or any engineering consequence fatally wrong-?can you discuss in more detail how west academics using linear correlation analysis may therefore cause fatal flaws in politics and media and all deep data models which societal trust between generations requiresso how does this risk making gov regulation or vision of AI wholly wrong for all human health can you contextually explain why he same exponential reasoning reveals risks of water and energy maps being wrong planned around our planet, and when eg Nviia's Jensen Huang says ai can be democratic equaliser, this also depends on human maps getting squared dynamics rightDo Taiwanese and neighbors have sufficeinnt undesrtanding of sqyared dynamics that educatirs everywhere else need to transform around their deep intelligencefurtermore do all western professions , media and educators have someting urgently to open (AI) model with Taiwanerse American engineers facing expoenetial maths crisis head on?please clarify: historically did EU AI regulations slow down true models millennails need?were the eu's own models of eg pensions and helath accidntally trapped in ponzi-scheme arithmetic due to population bubbles etc If i understand correctly Taiwan and China have hundreds of years of shared language and culture models so I sometimes wonder if it would be valid to say rest of world has bigger learning gap in understanding chinese and Taiwanese than China and Taiwan currently have; in any event it does not seem l,ikely the West will be hinest data connectir China and Taiwan now need?the question I dont know how to frame - statistically is some eastern intelligence nearest to above zero sum all millennilas need, whereas western linera models are stick at zeo sum or in case of wars on=r hate media below zero-sum5 eatsren places peoples seem heroic to me as a diaspora scot; prior questions show why i love taiwanese reasoning; arguably freedoms came first to singapore any way these 5 million people found a good independence beyond britain and dcelared wish to share with all asean peoples; next I feel great britain returned hk to china in a more equitable way than any other country would (please note scot in me finds this quite hard to admit)... before all this Jpapan has offered extraordinary post war enginnering models evn if for half a century prior it had ruled in worst way over most of East; and since freedom korea s engineers have been extrordinary too; i feel these places effectively united trust before they shared inytel with China's hoigely populated coastal cities- please comment?Also these 5 places have few if any carbon resources. so it it true they mainly grew with human brain power aligned with natureso how did these peoples free education at all levels to be curiously ahead of fast chnage rather than politically trapped within sqyared unprecedneted challenge to human brain connectionscan ai help beyond 5 places roughly 150+60+20+10+5 ie 3 per cent of human brains as core foundation ai model

Sovereign AI examples:Canada, European Public Broadcasting, EU1, Indonesia, Germany Deutsche Telecom.. Kion Warehouse AI
Latest AI AGENT NEWS IN WEST -FROM CREATORS OF BILLION TIMES SMARTER MATHEMATICIANS (HUANG, HASSABIS) FROM GROK, OPEN AI - please send news from asia chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Agentic AI stories of Billion times greater maths brain. & 10**18 More Tech.***Huang*Hassabis*Musk  .Billion Times Greater Maths Brain ..***Neumann*Einstein*Turing
MOST EXCITING TIMES TO BE ALIVE_ CHOOSING WHAT TO DO WITH CHIPS*COMPUTERS*DEEP DATA SOVEREIGNTY MOBILSATION Thanks to Moores Law, Satellite Death of Distance, Jensen's Law - peoples can now work with 10**18 more tech in 2025 than 1965 but where is freedom of intelligence blooming? AI vibrancy Rankings places supporting people's application of 1000 times more tech every 15 years from 1965 and million times more tech from 1995- Japan since 1950; West Coast USA & Taiwan from 1965; Singapore HK Korea Cambridge UK from 1980; China UAE from 1995; from 2010 rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk Grok3 suggest 2025 Biotech miracles for Asian and African Plants Since Nov 2023 King Charles launch of AI world series has also converted French, Korea and India Generation of Intelref pov museums Jan 2025: For millennials to intelligence human sustainability, does UN need moving from USA to Japan?

Ref JUK0

ED, AI: Welcome to 64th year of linking Japan to Intelligence Flows of Neumann-Einstein-Turing - The Economist's 3 gamechnagers of 1950s .. Norman Macrae, Order 3 of Rising Sun ...Wash DC, Summer 25: Son & Futures co-author Chris.Macrae Linkedin UNwomens) writes: My passion connecting generations of intelligences of Asian and Western youth follows from dad's work and my own Asian privileges starting with work for Unilever Indonesia 1982 - first of 60 Asian data building trips. 3 particular asian miracles fill our valuation system mapping diaries: empowerment of poorest billion women, supercity design, tech often grounded in deepest community goals; human energy, health, livelihood ed, safe & affordable family life integrating transformation to mother earth's clean energy and Einstein's 1905 deep data transformations. All of above exponentially multiply ops and risks as intelligence engineering now plays with 10**18 more tech than when dad's first named article in The Economist Considered Japan 1962 - with all of JFKennedy, Prince Charles & Japan Emperor joining in just as silicon chips, computation machines and satellites changed every way we choose to learn or teach or serve or celebrate each other
>
EconomistJapan.com: Help map Neumann's Japan's gifts to humanity since 1945, all Asia Rising 1960+ AND invest in hi-trust millennials' brains now!Friends and Family
Future History


Journalism of 10**18 More Tech. Norman Macrae became Economist diarist of Neumann (Einstein Turing) in 1951. All three of the NET died suddenly (last notes Neumann - Computer & Brain , Bethesda 1956) but not before training economic jounalists of Neural Network maths and coding aim to map win-wins of their legacy of 10**18 more tech by 2025, JF Kennedy and Royal families of UK and Japan were first to debate what this might look like from 1962 - in 2025 the most exciting AI & BioI (learning) games millennials can play are rooted to exponential mappingAI Game 1 douible loops through 3 AI wizards, nations' AI leaders
Jensen Huang
Demis Hassabis
Yann Lecun.
Bloomberg
45 Cities- Civil Eng Road of Things
SAIS 70 nations youth ambassadors of win-win science
Deep learning billion year leaps in Einstein 1905 maths e=mcsquared starting with biotech's 250 million proteins.
Emperor Naruhito
King Charles
Narendra Modi.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Agentic AI Gov2 -how academics often fail to map deep data AI needs millennials to interact

 At a high school level, let’s explore how the non-linear nature of Einstein’s E = mc² (as opposed to a simpler, linear E = mc) connects to potential flaws in politics, media, and deep data models, and how this impacts societal trust between generations.

Non-Linearity and Its Broader ImplicationsEinstein’s equation E = mc² shows that small amounts of mass can produce massive energy because the speed of light (c) is squared, leading to exponential outcomes. This non-linear relationship means small changes can have huge, unpredictable effects. If the equation were E = mc, the relationship would be linear—double the mass, double the energy—making predictions straightforward. The non-linear nature of E = mc² is a reminder that many systems, including those in society, don’t scale predictably. Small inputs can lead to massive consequences, and failing to account for this can cause serious problems in politics, media, and data models, ultimately affecting trust between generations.Fatal Flaws in PoliticsIn politics, leaders often rely on linear thinking, assuming that small policy changes will have proportional effects. For example, a politician might think, “If we cut emissions by 10%, we’ll reduce warming by 10%.” But climate systems are non-linear, like E = mc². A small increase in greenhouse gases can trigger compounded effects, like melting ice caps or extreme weather, which spiral out of control. Politicians who ignore these non-linear risks—by using oversimplified models or short-term thinking—can create policies that fail catastrophically, like underfunding climate action or ignoring economic tipping points.This linear mindset also shows up in how politicians communicate. They might promise simple fixes (“more jobs = better economy”) without considering non-linear consequences, like automation displacing workers or wealth inequality skyrocketing. When these oversimplified promises fail, younger generations lose trust in leaders, feeling misled about the future.Fatal Flaws in MediaMedia often amplifies linear thinking by simplifying complex issues into catchy headlines or short soundbites. For example, a news story might say, “New tech will solve climate change,” ignoring the non-linear challenges—like how scaling green tech too slowly could still lead to climate tipping points. This creates a false sense of security, much like assuming E = mc when the reality is E = mc². Sensationalized or oversimplified reporting can also exaggerate small events into massive narratives, polarizing society and eroding trust.Younger generations, who often rely on social media, see through this when promised solutions don’t materialize. For instance, media might hype a new policy as a game-changer, but when non-linear realities (like economic or environmental feedback loops) lead to failure, Gen Z and beyond feel betrayed by the “hype” and lose faith in institutions.Fatal Flaws in Deep Data ModelsDeep data models—like those used in AI, economics, or climate predictions—can also fail when they rely on linear assumptions. For example, many models assume that trends (like population growth or resource use) will continue proportionally, but real-world systems are non-linear. A small error in a climate model, like underestimating methane release, can lead to wildly inaccurate predictions, similar to how a tiny mass in E = mc² produces massive energy. If these models don’t account for compounded effects, they can mislead decision-makers, leading to policies or technologies that backfire.For instance, an AI model predicting economic growth might miss non-linear effects like a sudden market crash triggered by a small event (e.g., a single company’s failure sparking a chain reaction). When these models fail, society faces real-world consequences—like job losses or environmental disasters—that hit younger generations hardest, who inherit the fallout.Impact on Societal Trust Between GenerationsTrust between generations depends on older generations (leaders, media, and model-builders) preparing a stable future for younger ones. When politics, media, or data models rely on linear thinking, they underestimate non-linear risks, leading to failures that disproportionately affect the young. For example:
  • Climate inaction: Older leaders using linear models might downplay climate risks, leaving younger generations to face extreme weather or resource scarcity.
  • Economic missteps: Policies based on linear predictions (e.g., “more tech = more jobs”) might ignore non-linear outcomes like automation wiping out entire industries, leaving young people with fewer opportunities.
  • Media misinformation: When media oversimplifies or misrepresents issues, younger generations feel misled when reality hits, like when “green tech” doesn’t stop climate disasters.
These failures break trust. Young people see older generations as out of touch or reckless, while older generations might view youth as overly critical. This divide grows when non-linear consequences—like climate tipping points or economic crashes—catch society off guard, and the young bear the brunt.How to Avoid These FlawsTo rebuild trust and avoid fatal flaws, politics, media, and data models need to embrace non-linear thinking, like the lesson from E = mc²:
  • Politics: Leaders should use models that account for feedback loops and tipping points, like in climate or economic systems, and communicate uncertainties honestly.
  • Media: Report complexities accurately, avoiding oversimplified narratives, and educate the public on non-linear risks (e.g., how small CO₂ increases cause big climate shifts).
  • Data Models: AI and predictive models should incorporate non-linear dynamics, regularly updating to reflect real-world feedback loops.
  • Intergenerational Dialogue: Older generations should involve youth in planning, ensuring policies address long-term, non-linear risks that affect the future.
TakeawayThe non-linear nature of E = mc² shows how small changes can lead to massive, unpredictable outcomes, unlike the simpler E = mc. In politics, media, and deep data models, relying on linear thinking can cause fatal flaws—failed policies, misleading narratives, or inaccurate predictions—that erode trust between generations. By recognizing and planning for non-linear, compounded impacts, society can make better decisions, ensuring a future that younger generations can trust in.

No comments:

Post a Comment