what if only 25% of americans have energy and water to support advanced manufactiring (problem transmission not energy production)
qhat if slowing down electric car marketyy slows down participatinon in biggest ever matkert- sateky of autonomous mobile
what if after giving trump 100 days musk has to go back to pacific caost to kwp lwead in space and ytansportation; (suggestion if trump fals out with america's top engineer all wall street engineering companies will cola[se in value)
what if most immediate innovation market is biotech (uk 250 million protein model) suggest designing medical big data is now race everywjhere - so why does usa appear to be deleting medical data and sacking medical reserachers
what if america already gains from most food marlkets by not having tarifs; eg its coffee companies take most of the added value of coffee but cant grow it; what if same can be said for most fashion/apparel market where the addeed value is in the design not the manufacturing; what if ameica's lead of sports markets upsets fans suddenly paying triple cost of team branded fashiowear; what if the same is true of pop and arts fashion markets let alone tourism markets
what if 96% of people outside of america see traifs on their countries as turing americans from the number 1 nation to fan to the bottom nation to fan
what if this happens just as the advantage of speaking the english languiage disapperas as language models end translation dig=vides
what if by tying up attention of world' to tarifs, trump makes putin ever stronger- tyhere are 2 possibilities w=either sanctions mean putin is runnining out of time or (some evidence exists) sanctions are being busyted by big finance and india as much as china ( b countries with large bordres with russia cant afford to lead oposition to putin if usa is not transparently leading this)
what if skills of advanced manufacturing take 15 years to learn because many involve deep sme enetrneurship not the sort of innovation biggest corporations bowling alone train employees in - nb accounting of big corporations sees training people as cost not an investment
In 1956 Neumann Einstein Turing left the wordl with the moist valuable innovation puzzle - how to apply 10**18 more tech over next 2 generations to 2025 so as to resolve every system faultline of empire era- both border crises (eg landlocked nations cant participate without friendly shipping partners), newtons science conflicted with earth's deepst innovation (biotech' health, and other safetry techs of energy and preventing polution by poisonos chemicals)
between 1955-1962 biuggest leaps made pacific where demings quality engoneering united us west coast and eg japan and soon korea taiwan
1962-1969 all 3 omillion fold more techs start but at very differemnt expoential s[eeds )silicon million forld 65-95) - satellite data mainly 2000-22015; accelerated compting idea 2002 to 2020 scale nt to 2012; while us east coast eg kennedy co-instigatir of how his assintaion and way us tv media was designed failed to adrress how atlantic was diverging evermore from pacific sme supply chains and agility to pass on contimous improvement to soeciety/comsumers not just biggest fiancial corporates
1876 enetreprenurail revolution published by london's economist and italy's prodi with case studies ilustrating future of every mnnation east of iran but by now oil crises were taking over east coast attention
and so it goes on
No comments:
Post a Comment